Legal Opinion

Long v. Saufley

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1889No. 11707PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne., C.

Action upon a contract to pay plaintiff five hundred dollars “out of money collected on judgment in action of Frank v. Kilbourn et al., .... provided the-said money shall be collected from property of defendant pointed out by the said Long.” The complaint avers that said Long “ did point out property belonging to said Kilbourn of the value of thirty thousand dollars out of which said judgment could have been collected, and did keep and perform all the requirements of said agreement on his part to be kept and performed ”; but that defendant compromised and settled said judgment by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carl v. EadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Barnum v. GreenColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Long v. SaufleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Barnum v. GreenColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API