Ahmed v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
After a jury trial, appellant Ahmed You-sef Ahmed (“Ahmed”) was convicted of first degree child sexual abuse, 1 second degree, child sexual abuse, 2 and incest. 3 The complaining witness in the case was Ahmed’s daughter (“H.A.”). On appeal, Ahmed argues that the trial court erred when it: 1) failed to remove two jurors for cause, forcing him to use his peremptory challenges to excuse the jurors, 2) excluded expert testimony on the way children remember and relate events, and 3) allowed H.A. to testify outside his presence. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On February 22,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dyas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Barrows v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Langston v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Hobbs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re K.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.