Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1982No. 81-51, 81-123PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Following a two and one-half day jury trial, appellants Alphonso Taylor and Harvey Tucker were both convicted of the armed robbery of John and Wanda Albert, D.C.Code 1981, §§ 22-2901, -3202, as well as carrying a pistol without a license. Id. § 22-3204. Appellant Taylor was individually convicted of assault with intent to kill while armed. Id. §§ 22-501, -3202. The case against Taylor rested on identifications by Wanda Albert and by two police officers who testified that they saw Taylor as he fled the scene of the crime. Taylor was arrested several days after the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. LawhornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Benn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API