Legal Opinion
Faison v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1447 (RMC)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Greta Faison, sixty-one years of age, complains that the District of Columbia twice discriminated against her on the basis of her age in violation of the D.C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., when it failed to promote her in January and September of 2005 and awarded the positions to younger women. Ms. Faison’s claims under the DCHRA will be dismissed due to her failure to provide notice to the Mayor of the District of Columbia within six…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Golden v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Owens v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Francis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Musgrove v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.