Legal Opinion

Coxe v. . Dillard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The plaintiff alleged that the land was sold .to the defendants,- but that the deed was made to L. E. Sorrell for their convenience and at their request. The demurrer admits this allegation. Hence Sorrell was merely holding the-title to the land for the use and benefit of the defendants.

-Plaintiff further alleged that Sorrell conveyed the property to the defendants by a deed containing a covenant according-, to• the .terms of which the defendants agreed to pay the indebtedness described, in the complaint. The demurrer admits this allegation.

Upon this state of the record the trial judge was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peele v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Powell v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Dale v. Gaither Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Keller v. . ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Handle Co. v. . Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Balentine v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of Columbia v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API