Powell v. . Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It was chiefly objected to the validity of the verdict that there were no facts in evidence tending to show authority on the part of J. R. Wood to bind the defendant company to payment of plaintiff's claim; but, on the record, we are of opinion that the position cannot be maintained. A general agent is said to be one who is authorized to act for his principal in all matters concerning a particular business or employment of a particular nature. Tiffany on Agency, p. 191. And it is the recognized rule that such an agent may usually bind his principal as to all acts within the scope of his…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Bank v. Hay.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Morpul Research Corp. v. Westover Hardware, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Toni v. Kingan & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.