Legal Opinion

Handle Co. v. . Plumbing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff brought the action to recover certain personal property, with damages for its detention, and the amount of certain notes alleged to be due by defendants to it. The defendants Wooten Benigar [Renigar] were engaged in manufacturing handle slabs, which were used by the plaintiff in its business. Plaintiff contracted with Wooten Renigar to purchase from them all the handle slabs they could manufacture which were suitable for use in its mill, and in order to assist Wooten Renigar in making the slabs, plaintiff agreed to supply them with a certain amount of money to buy timber and to pay…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Voorhees v. Porter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Whitehurst v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Threadgill v. . McLendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Balentine v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. National Surety Co. v. Jackson County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  4. Gennett v. . LyerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Lesser-Goldman Cotton Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API