Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Faircloth

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 4, 1995No. ACM S29049Published

1DissentPearson, Senior Judge

I agree with Judge Becker’s discussion concerning the validity of appellant’s guilty plea to forgery. I do not need an in-depth foray into the law of negotiable instruments to conclude that appellant forged the check when he made the copayee’s indorsement to it without authority. I part company with both Judges Becker and Morgan concerning the providency of appellant’s plea to stealing the proceeds of the check from his co-payee, Ford Motor Credit Corporation (FMCC). I would affirm the larceny conviction and the sentence.

LARCENY FROM THE CO-PAYEE OF A CHECK THROUGH FORGERY

Reduced to its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. Thomas J. FaustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. NorvellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API