Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas J. Faust

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1988No. 87-1166PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Thomas Faust appeals his convictions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 495 and 641 (1982) for forgery and embezzlement.

On October 8, 1980, the federal government entered into a security agreement with Tractug Associates in accordance with the Federal Ship Mortgage Insurance Program, Title XI, Merchant Marine Act of 1936. Under this agreement, the Maritime Administration (MARAD), which is a division within the United States Department of Transportation, guaranteed approximately $25 million in bonds and notes, thus enabling Tractug Associates to obtain financing for the construction of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. Paul Rowton BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. FairclothCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. Terrill DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Hector Jesus Hernandez, Aka: Mauricio Solis, United States of America v. Jorge Walter CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Daniel D. RostenkowskiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API