United States v. Morrison
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Judge:
1. A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of missing movement through design, in violation of Article 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 887. The military judge also convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of willful disobedience of the order of a superior commissioned officer (2 specifications), in violation of Article 90, UCMJ, 10 USC § 890. The approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 12 months, partial forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. WeymouthCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. OatneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.