Banks v. Wittenberg
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.
This is a medical malpractice action. A vasectomy was performed on plaintiff Clinton V. Banks by one of the defendant doctors in the Livernois Clinic on an outpatient basis on March 5, 1971. Complications, including a large hematoma, arose after the surgery. The physical problems required that plaintiff be hospitalized and that he undergo further surgery in late March of 1971. Plaintiffs claim of malpractice relates to the surgical procedure and the postoperative care given by these defendants. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action and plaintiff appeals.
I
Plaintiff challenges the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Mims v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Kritzer v. CitronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Shinabarger v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Schwartz v. TriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunn v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jones v. MalloyNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Dehring v. Northern Mich. Exploration Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Elmore v. EllisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Werth v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.