Legal Opinion

Mims v. Boland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1964No. 40637PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In addition to numerous special grounds, the plaintiff in error excepts to the judgment of the trial court denying movant’s motion for new trial on the general grounds. We have therefore carefully reviewed the evidence and from this have concluded that final disposition of this appeal must rest on the general grounds albeit in a fashion not contemplated by the appellant.

As declared by plaintiff’s counsel, this case has its basis in assault and battery, not upon the theory of medical malpractice. Although the suit is against a physician and his laboratory technician for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Pratt v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rolater v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Perna v. PirozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Pugsley v. PrivetteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. Hendricks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Irwin v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Newsome v. Cooper-Wiss, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API