San Francisco Savings Union v. R. G. R. Petroleum & Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Grant Jackson, J. W. Smith, and E. A. Rizor, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appeal from judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
The action was brought to obtain an injunction and to have abated an alleged nuisance erected in front of plaintiff’s land on the seashore below the line of ordinary high water. Plaintiff is, and was at the times mentioned in the complaint, the owner of the tract of land described therein, bounded on the south by the Pacific Ocean. The fee to the strip of land south of the plaintiff’s southern boundary between the mean high-water mark and the low-water mark where the tide ebbs and flows belongs to the state of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Blackwell v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Galveston v. MannTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1967
- CRV Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.