Charles v. UPS National Long Term Disability Plan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Stengel, District Judge
This case stems from Aetna’s' denial of long-term disability benefits ünder an ERISA-covered- employee benefits plan.1 The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, I will grant the plaintiffs motion in part and enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff on Count I. - ,
1. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Marvin Charles is a 57-year-old high school graduate.2 He started working *385at UPS as a Pre-loader/Porter.3 He was promoted to the role of package car driver in 1992, making between $50,000-60,000 a year.4 Prior to working at UPS, Mr.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reichard v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- CP HOWE & ARDEN LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION; DOES 1-25District Court, E.D. California · 2026