Legal Opinion

CP HOWE & ARDEN LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION; DOES 1-25

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 4, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02637Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CP HOWE & ARDEN LLC, a No. 2:25-cv-02637-JAM-JDP Delaware limited liability 12 company, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATION’S MOTION 14 v. TO DISMISS 15 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; and 16 DOES 1-25, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Starbucks 20 Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff CP Howe & Arden LLC’s 21 Complaint. ECF No. 8-1, Defendant’s Memorandum of Points and 22 Authorities (“Mot.”). Plaintiff filed an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API