Legal Opinion

Simonton v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1958No. Civ. No. 5730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

In this damage action arising out of a collision between two automobiles, which case was tried by the court without a jury, it rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff-respondent against defendant-appellant. A motion for new trial was denied.

Defendant and his wife were bound for Oklahoma in their Chevrolet sedan, and were traveling in the south lane, easterly, on United States Highway 99, in Beaumont, on May 14, 1954, about 6 :45 a.m. It was dark enough to require lights. Veile Street in said town runs north and south and intersects United States Highway 99 at about right angles. There is a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Wilkerson v. City of El MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Nitta v. HaslamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laymon v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Crooks v. PirroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Crooks v. PirroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API