Legal Opinion

Keaton v. Pearson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1987No. 22744PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant Keaton commenced this action against respondent Pearson to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained in an automobile collision. The jury returned a verdict for Pearson. Keaton appeals on the ground the trial judge erred in allowing the jury to consider her failure to use a seat belt. We reverse.

The parties’ vehicles collided when Pearson attempted to make a left turn across the oncoming lane of traffic in which Keaton was traveling. Both cars were moving at less than fifteen m.p.h. when the collision occurred. Property damage was slight. Keaton, however,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Fischer v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Sams v. SamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  5. Schmitzer v. Misener-Bennett Ford, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Poston v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Davis v. KnipplingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Clark v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Mayes v. PaxtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API