Legal Opinion

Schmitzer v. Misener-Bennett Ford, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1984No. Docket 67515, 68924PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

In this appeal we are asked to reconsider the admissibility of evidence of a plaintiffs non-use of a seat belt as evidence of contributory negligence in light of this state’s adoption of comparative negligence.

I

In No. 67515, defendants, Misc.er-Bennett Ford and Monica Tanner, sought to amend their complaint following the deposition of Ronald Hines, M.D., the coroner, during which he opined that, if Nathan Schmitzer, plaintiffs decedent, had used his seat belt, "he would still be alive”. After hearing oral arguments, the circuit court denied defendants’ motion to amend their answer to include…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Hampton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Romankewiz v. BlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Estate Motors Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kirk v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Potts v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Dunn v. DursoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Ullery v. SobieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API