Davis v. Knippling
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Drivers must slow to fifteen miles-per-hour when approaching an intersection if they have an obstructed view of other vehicles entering the intersection. Was the trial court correct in applying this rule to an intersection on a through highway? Because such highways are designed to allow traffic to maintain constant speed, we conclude the obstructed view rule was inapplicable. The court also erred in instructing the jury that failure to use a seatbelt can be considered a failure to mitigate damages. We find no abuse of discretion, however, in admitting evidence of…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Carpenter v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.