Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Moore

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 24, 1973No. C-329PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

On certiorari, the sole issue which we are called upon to resolve relates to the pleading and use of the so-called seat belt defense in Colorado to establish contributory negligence. In a well reasoned opinion expressing the views of the Court of Appeals, the late Judge William F. Dwyer thoroughly analyzed the law relating to the failure to use seat belts and concluded that under the doctrine of contributory negligence, as it then existed in Colorado, the failure to use seat belts neither established contributory negligence nor provided an affirmative defense. Moore v. Fischer, 31 Colo. App.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Newbury v. VogelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. Mount v. McClellanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Amend v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Waterson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kopischke v. First Continental Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Dennis C. Sours v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API