T.M. v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review the decision in State v. T.M., 761 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified two questions to be of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
The facts as summarized from the district court’s opinion are as follows. The City of Pinellas Park adopted a juvenile curfew oi’dinance to reduce juvenile crime and victimization. See T.M., 761 So.2d at 1143. The ordinance declares it unlawful for a juvenile to be or remain in a public place or establishment between 11 pan. *443and 6 a.m. of the following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Qutb v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- PALM HARBOR SP. FIRE CONTROL D. v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Dale Lee Norman v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.