Legal Opinion

State v. T.M.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2002No. 2D98-3778PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

DAVIS, Judge.

This matter is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. The issue is whether the City of Pinellas Park’s juvenile curfew ordinance is unconstitutional. In the initial appeal we had upheld the ordinance under a heightened scrutiny test. The Florida Supreme Court reversed and remanded for us to consider the ordinance under a strict scrutiny standard. We hold the ordinance unconstitutional under this test.

The State appeals the trial court’s order declaring the City of Pinellas Park’s juvenile curfew ordinance unconstitutional and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. T.M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. T.M. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. J.P. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JPSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. State v. TMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API