Legal Opinion

Bumgarner v. Bumgarner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1950No. 239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant demurs ore tennis in this Court on the ground that the issuing and serving of a second summons, with a copy of the amended complaint, constitutes a new action; and, that the allegations in the amended complaint are insufficient to give the court jurisdiction in a suit for alimony.

The so-called amended complaint is only an amendment to the original complaint in this cause, and it is so stated therein. We think the complaint as amended does allege sufficient facts, if proven, to support a claim for alimony without divorce.

The issuing and serving of an additional summons in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Phillips v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Davis v. SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Davis v. SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API