Emerald People's Utility District v. Pacificorp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment awarding costs, disbursements, attorney fees and expert expenses to defendant Pacificorp in this condemnation action.
Defendant raised defenses against the proposed taking. Consequently, the trial court bifurcated the case into a trial to consider those defenses, to be followed, if necessary, by a trial to determine the value of the property. Because defendant prevailed on its defenses, the valuation question was not reached.
Plaintiff first contends that the trial court erred by awarding certain expenses to defendant that it incurred for the services of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. JeppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Emerald People's Utility District v. PacificorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Marquez v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Urban Renewal Agency v. Starr Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Emerald People's Utility District v. PacificorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crandon Capital Partners v. ShelkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District v. AizawaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Sarkisian v. Newmar IndustriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Wentz v. Progressive Direct Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021