Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Jeppe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1986No. 84-04-19, 501-L CA A33607PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*687ROSSMAN, J.

In this action on a contract, plaintiffs prevailed on a motion for summary judgment. There is no merit in defendant’s first assignment of error; judgment for plaintiffs in the amount of $24,108.18 was proper. The sole issue requiring discussion is whether the trial court erred in determining the amount of attorney fees which plaintiffs should receive pursuant to the contract, which provided for recovery of “such sums as the court hearing the suit or controversy shall determine as reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.”

Before final determination of their motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Parker v. ScharbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stumpf v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Crandon Capital Partners v. ShelkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District v. AizawaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Marquez v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API