Legal Opinion

Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 2008No. 0011-11691 A123575 (Control), 0011-11695 A123576PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

This shareholder derivative action is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court. See Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk, 202 Or App 537, 123 P3d 385 (2005) (Crandon I); Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk, 342 Or 555, 157 P3d 176 (2007) (Crandon II). Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s judgment denying attorney fees. In our first opinion, we held that the underlying dispute had become moot before the trial court addressed the asserted entitlement to fees, and that, therefore, the court lacked jurisdiction to enter such an award. The Supreme Court reversed that decision and remanded to us…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ballard v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Htaike v. SeinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Bernards v. Summit Real Estate Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Classen v. Arete NW, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API