Legal Opinion
Wentz v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 6, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00473Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MATTHEW WENTZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-00473-MO Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., This matter comes before me on Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company’s Motion for Attorney Fees [ECF 18]. For the reasons set forth below, I GRANT in part and DENY in part Progressive’s motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Matthew Wentz was injured in a hit-and-run in January 2020. Notice of Removal [ECF 1] Ex. 2 7-8 (hereinafter “Compl.”). He brings this case against his insurer,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.