Legal Opinion

Davis v. Ralston Purina Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1970No. 5-5180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This appeal is from a circuit court -order refusing to set aside a jury verdict and grant a new trial. The appellants concede-that such an order will be reversed only upon a showing that the trial court manifestly abused its- discretion in the matter. Thomas v. Arnold, 192 Ark. 1127, 96 S. W. 2d 1108 (1936).

Over a period of years the appellants, father and son, raised turkeys, produced hen eggs, and hauled feed under contracts with the appellee Ralston Purina Company. For reasons about which the evidence is in conflict the appellants eventually became heavily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulbright v. PhippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Alexander v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Thomas v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Frank Lyon CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Millers Casualty Ins. v. HolbertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Ralston Purina Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Garrison Properties, Inc. v. Branton Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. RYN, Inc. v. Platte County Memorial Hospital Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API