Legal Opinion

Fulbright v. Phipps

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1928PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee brought suit against the administratrix of the estate of Jay Fulbright, deceased, upon a demand for alleged unpaid salary amounting to $10,000, and offered testimony tending to show that the demand was just, and that he was entitled to receive the amount sued for.

Testimony was offered by the defendant administratrix to the effect that nothing was due appellee, and that the demand upon which he sued had been compromised and settled. Had the verdict been for the defendant we would be required to hold that the testimony was ample to sustain the finding.

After the jury had had the case…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Twist v. MullinixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Dunbar v. CowgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  3. Carroll v. Texarkana Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Scharff Distilling Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Krummen Motor Bus & Taxi Co. v. Mechanics' Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rector v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Howell v. Worth James Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Smith v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Trammell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API