Legal Opinion

Millers Casualty Ins. v. Holbert

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 18, 1972No. 5-5977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman Justice.

The circuit judge granted appellee’s motion for a new trial of his claim against appellant for losses on account of vandalism and malicious mischief which he asserted came within the coverage of insurance policies issued by appellant. The jury verdict on appellee’s claim for damage to a duplex dwelling house was for appellant. On a claim for damage to an apartment, the verdict fixed the loss at only $5,800, although appellee claimed that the loss amounted to $15,000, and introduced evidence which might have sustained such a verdict. The basis for granting a new trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fulbright v. PhippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Alexander v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Davis v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Hardin v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. English v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Heil v. RoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Hubbard v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. English v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API