Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Thrash

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1910No. 559PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error, from District Court, Custer County; W. N. Maben, Judge. Action by H. S. Edwards against J. N. Thrash and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The following questions are raised on this record: (1) As to whether the trustees of an incorporated town or village in the improvement of a street are authorized in the exercise of their municipal authority 'to change a previously established grade of a street, and (a) will an injunction lie to prevent such change until the abutting property owner has been previously compensated for any consequential damages arising therefrom?

Section 94:2, Comp. Laws 1909 (section 610, Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. Okla., 1903), provides:

“Any city, town or village organized under and by virtue of a special act or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Moore v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Stetson v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Allen v. Transok Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Summerford v. Board of Com'rs.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API