Legal Opinion
Allen v. Transok Pipe Line Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 20, 1976No. 47921PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice.
This appeal involves an action by a landowner seeking punitive and other non-land damages for trespass against a pipeline company that took his property without resorting to condemnation proceedings.
Appellant is not seeking recovery for the value of the land taken; he is seeking recovery for injuries caused by Appellee’s tortious conduct. In fact, Appellant’s prayer for relief includes a request that the Appellee be directed to remove the pipelines and compensate him for the further injury caused thereby.
The events forming the basis for these proceedings are briefly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ossman v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Vinson v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hagenson v. United Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Stinchcomb v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Edwards v. ThrashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- McMillian v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Ward Petroleum Corp. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Public Service Co. v. B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- State ex rel. Board of Regents v. McCloskey Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.