Legal Opinion
Thomas Augusta v. Marshall Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1979No. 77-3550PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Augusta, purchased a Ford automobile from a Ford Dealer, appellee Marshall Motor Co. Augusta desired financing of the purchase, which Marshall arranged through appellee Ford Motor Credit Co. Augusta executed an “instalment contract” which was forthwith assigned by Marshall to Ford Credit, and Augusta was shortly thereafter supplied with a payment coupon book by Ford Credit.
Augusta then sued Marshall and Ford Credit, contending that under the Truth-In-Lending Act and Regulation Z issued by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to the Act, Marshall and Ford Credit were required to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Price v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Augusta v. Marshall Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CenanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kramer v. Marine Midland BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Boncyk v. Cavanaugh MotorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Cenance v. Bohn Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.