Legal Opinion
Augusta v. Marshall Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 9, 1977No. Civ. A. C77-430PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KRUPANSKY, District Judge.
This is an action instituted by the plaintiff, Thomas Augusta (Augusta), pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act of 1968, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq, and the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972, 15 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.
The Amended Complaint states two claims, the first of which is brought pursu ant to the Truth in Lending Act and regulations promulgated thereunder at 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq. (commonly known as Regulation Z), against defendants Marshall Motor Company (Marshall) and Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Credit), wherein the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Brame v. Ray Bills Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Milhollin v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sharp v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.