Legal Opinion

Boncyk v. Cavanaugh Motors

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1981No. Nos. 77-2965, 77-2866 and 77-3075PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves two consolidated cases in which purchasers of used cars brought actions against the car dealers and the financing bank as creditors for violations of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601-1693. Plaintiff Sherry Hughes agreed on June 19, 1974, to purchase a used car from defendant Walt Martin Motors (“Martin”). Plaintiff John Boncyk agreed on July 26, 1974 to purchase a used car from defendant Cavanaugh Motors (“Cavanaugh”). Hughes and Boncyk each received and signed identical contracts entitled: “Security Agreement (Purchase Money): Motor…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Thos. P. Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica, and Sergio Quiros MarotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. King v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Lachapelle v. Toyota Motor Credit CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Steinbrecher v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Steinbrecher)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Bescos v. Bank of America, NT & SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API