Legal Opinion

Kane v. Quigley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1964No. Nos. 38584 and 38585PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 ’Neill, J.

The question presented is whether a minor child, acting through a parent as next friend, can maintain an action against a third party for wrongfully disrupting the family circle and depriving the child of affection, companionship and guidance of his father, and for bringing unwanted attention and unwarranted publicity to the child, causing him embarrassment, humiliation and loss of social standing.

There is no statutory basis for such a cause of action in Ohio.

Such an action is not known at common law.

At common law, the benefits and duties accruing as a result of the family…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller v. MonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Johnson v. LuhmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  3. Taylor v. KeefeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Henson v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Morrow v. YannantuonoNew York Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gallimore v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. High v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API