Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Henson v. Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, J.

Civil action to recover damages for criminal conversation with and alienation of the affections of plaintiffs' mother, heard on demurrer.

Plaintiffs are the infant children of their next friend and his wife, Estelle Henson. They allege in substance that they and their parents lived happily together in a new home; that defendant, for the purpose of seducing their mother and alienating her affections, paid constant court to her; that as a result of his improper attentions she was induced to leave home on various occasions and go to other cities where she engaged in illicit relations with him;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Daily v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  3. Johnson v. LuhmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  4. Taylor v. KeefeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hunt Ex Rel. Hunt v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Redding Ex Rel. Redding v. ReddingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Kane v. QuigleyOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Scholberg v. ItnyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mode v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API