High v. Howard
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
In a recent decision of this court, we noted that it was not yet the propitious time to review the issue of whether a child may maintain a cause of action for loss of parental consortium against a tortfeasor who negligently or intentionally injures the child’s parent. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 84, 94, 585 N.E.2d 384, 393. Now is such time. Appellants urge us to recognize a cause of action for loss of parental consortium. We decline to create such a cause of action.
This court has previously refused to recognize a cause of action by a child for loss of parental consortium.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Borer v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Gallimore v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Heiner v. MoretuzzoOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. MuethingOhio Supreme Court · 1992
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.