Legal Opinion

United States v. Brundidge

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 31, 1983No. CM 443644PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to his plea appellant was found guilty of committing an indecent, lewd and lascivious act with Private B in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The act alleged was sexual intercourse between appellant and Private B in the presence of Specialist D and Private T. The providence inquiry establishes that the act of intercourse took place in Specialist D’s sleeping area in a darkened three-person barracks room. Specialist D and Private T were in the common area of that barracks room, which was screened from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. FagnanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CarrU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. BrundidgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API