United States v. Brundidge
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WOLD, Senior Judge:
Pursuant to his plea appellant was found guilty of committing an indecent, lewd and lascivious act with Private B in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The act alleged was sexual intercourse between appellant and Private B in the presence of Specialist D and Private T. The providence inquiry establishes that the act of intercourse took place in Specialist D’s sleeping area in a darkened three-person barracks room. Specialist D and Private T were in the common area of that barracks room, which was screened from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. FagnanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. CarrU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. BrundidgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989