Legal Opinion

Neves v. Wright

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1981No. 16910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated this action to rescind a uniform real estate contract for the purchase of a home and to obtain restitution of their payments. Defendants, as sellers, counterclaimed, seeking a declaration of plaintiffs’ default under the contract and a foreclosure of plaintiffs’ interest. The parties stipulated to a sale of the property, with plaintiffs retaining their right to pro*1197ceed pursuant to their complaint, and defendants reserving their rights under the counterclaim. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ demand for rescission and restitution of their payments,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bryant v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Foxley v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Grundmeyer v. McFadinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Adams v. ReedUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Woodard v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Century 21 All Western Real Estate & Investment Inc. v. WebbUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bergstrom v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Utah Golf Association, Inc. v. City of North Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Callister v. Millstream Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API