Callister v. Millstream Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment against them in an action they commenced to recover damages for defendant’s alleged breach of an agreement to buy real estate. After a two day trial to the court, the district court agreed with defendant’s position that it was entitled to rescission of the agreement because (1) plaintiffs were unable to convey clear title at closing and (2) plaintiffs misled defendant concerning the number of apartment units that could be built on the property. We affirm the judgment against plaintiffs, albeit on only one of the grounds relied on by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- BLT Investment Co. v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Bergstrom v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Flemetis v. McArthurUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Leonard v. WoodruffUtah Supreme Court · 1901
- Marlowe Investment Corporation v. RadmallUtah Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Robert Langston, Ltd. v. McQuarrieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.