Legal Opinion

Foxley v. Rich

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1909No. 1961PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, First District. Hon. W. W. Monaghan, Judge. Action by Charles E. Foxley against J. Y. Rich and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The pleadings in this case cover twenty-eight pages of the printed abstract, and are too long to be set forth even' in condensed form. The evidence is also quite voluminous, and we shall not attempt to set it forth, except such parts as we deem are controlling of the principles involved. The object of. the action was to recover back money paid by respondent to the appellant J. Y. Rich in pursuance of a certain executory contract entered into between them, whereby respondent agreed to purchase from said Rich certain lots, together with a dwelling-house thereon, in Brigham City, Utah. The other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. County of Calhoun v. American Emigrant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Reddish v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. James v. . BurchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. IrwinArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ferguson v. CasparDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. McBride v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Bergstrom v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API