Legal Opinion

Bergstrom v. Moore

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1984No. 18656PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice.

The appellants seek reversal of an order granting summary judgment to the respondent in his action for rescission of a Uniform Real Estate Contract. The issue is whether appellants’ failure to except certain easements from the property description in the warranty deed, placed in escrow pursuant to the Uniform Real Estate Contract, gave respondent the right to rescind as a matter of law. We affirm.

The following material facts were established before the trial court. In July 1981, the parties entered into a Uniform Real Estate Contract and the appellants (the sellers) deposited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foxley v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Jones v. Grow Investment and Mortgage CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Tremonton Inv. Co. v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Thackeray v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Brewer v. PeatrossUtah Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Willey v. WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Anderson v. DomsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Callister v. Millstream Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API