Edwards v. Gross
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
So far as the defendant Izóla Gross is concerned, no question is raised as to the service of the summons in the action. The sole question to be determined is whether the service of the complaint which was attached to the summons was a sufficient compliance with the provisions of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats. In brief this section of the statutes provides that notice of injury shall be given to the defendant within two years from the date of the accident. Said statute further provides that when an action shall be brought and a complaint actually served within the two-year period the notice of injury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Enea v. PfisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Sorenson v. StowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Leuchtenberg v. HoeschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Laurent v. PlainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Edlebeck v. HootenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- McNally v. GoodenoughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Strupp v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.