Legal Opinion

Leuchtenberg v. Hoeschler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1955PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

It is the contention of counsel for plaintiff on this appeal that upon the pleadings, affidavits, and adverse examinations considered by the trial court, in passing upon the motions of both parties for summary judgment, that it stands undisputed that the offer to purchase signed by the plaintiff was never accepted by the Warrens, as owners, in the form in which plaintiff signed the same, b'ut instead plaintiff’s said written offer had been subsequently altered by Evenson without his knowledge or consent. The claimed alteration consisted of striking out the figure “150” in the description of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Des Jardin v. Town of GreenfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hafemann v. KorinekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Carney-Rutter Agency, Inc. v. Central Office Buildings, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hess v. Holt Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Putman v. DeinhamerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Edwards v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fricano v. Bank of America NACourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  5. Ziolkowski v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API