Legal Opinion

Clark v. Auto Wholesale Co., Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, c. j.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover compensatory and punitive damages on account of the conversion by the defendant of plaintiff’s automobile. The jury awarded plaintiff both compensatory and punitive damages, and judgment was entered on the verdict. Thereafter the court entered an order eliminating the punitive damages from the judgment. From that order the plaintiff has appealed.

It is conceded in defendant’s brief that the only question involved in the appeal is the validity of the order eliminating the punitive damages from the verdict. The validity of that order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fritz v. RiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ernst v. Logan Oldsmobile Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Neal v. HaightOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Robinson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Fisch-Or, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Crow v. Junior BootshopsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ryerse v. HaddockOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Marriage of ConleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API