Legal Opinion

Crow v. Junior Bootshops

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Error was committed at the trial of this case. The only questions are whether defendant appealed in time, acquiesced in the error, or failed to properly preserve the claim of error for consideration upon appeal.

Plaintiff employee received a verdict against his employer for damages for personal injuries. These post-trial events occurred:

March 20 Judgment entered for plaintiff

Defendant filed its motion for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict March 27

Fifty-five days elapsed after entry of judgment May 14

Order granting new trial and denying motion for judgment notwithstanding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ira v. COLUMBIA FOOD CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Clark v. Auto Wholesale Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Boner v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Holland v. Sisters of Saint Joseph of PeaceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Holland v. Sisters of Saint Joseph of PeaceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. ex rel. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API