Legal Opinion

Ernst v. Logan Oldsmobile Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff purchasd an automobile from the defendant, and, as part of the transaction, according to his claim, ordered from the defendant a policy of bodily injury and property damage insurance. Later, according to plaintiff’s claim, an agent of defendant represented to him that he was “fully protected and covered.” In fact no such policy of insurance was ever issued. While driving the automobile plaintiff had a collision in which another driver, J. P. Cramer, Jr., was injured and his car damaged. Cramer brought an action for damages against the plaintiff, who employed an attorney to defend…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barone v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Shirley v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SpeerstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In re the Marriage of ConleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API