Cardiosom, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs and Defendant’s Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Because 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-3(a)(l)(D) prohibits judicial review of Plaintiffs claims, the Court finds there is no jurisdiction. Therefore, we GRANT Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and DISMISS as moot Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Statutory Background
In December 2003, Medicare Part B, a voluntary program that provides Medicare beneficiaries with supplemental medical insurance benefits and other…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bell/Heery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Cardiosom, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- B & H Medical, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cardiosom, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.