Legal Opinion
Cardiosom, LLC v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 31, 2011No. 2010-5109PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This case calls on us to determine whether, as Plaintiff-Appellant argues, the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims”) has subject matter jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1), over a breach of contract claim, when a statute related to the claim was read by that court to bar judicial review.
Congress, in 2008, enacted a revision to part of the Medicare statutes, known as the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, Pub.L. 110-275, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-3 (the “2008 Amendment”). The 2008 Amendment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Texas Alliance For Home Care v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Texas Alliance for Home Care Services v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Insurance Co. of the West v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- B & H Medical, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.